Review customer solicitation systematically
Organise the approach, existing business relationships, information basis and evidence before assessing a competitor’s conduct.
Targeting a competitor’s customers is not automatically unfair. An assessment under section 1 of the Austrian UWG considers the specific conduct, surrounding circumstances, existing obligations, the origin of the information used and the evidence. The loss of a customer alone does not establish an unfair competition violation.
This checklist deals only with customer approaches between competitors. Employee moves, employment-law non-compete clauses and seller obligations following a business sale are outside its scope.
You can tick off each item. Your progress is stored only in this browser on this device. No answers are sent to the firm.
0 of 20 items reviewed
01 Define the matter under review
Start by identifying the particular customer contact that needs to be assessed.
02 Preserve the approach in its original form
The exact wording, timing and channel are more useful than a later summary.
03 Record contracts and surrounding circumstances
An existing contract does not decide the unfair competition question by itself, but it forms part of the facts.
04 Trace the source of the information used
Document what enabled the targeted contact without assuming that information was used unlawfully.
05 Document the response and possible consequences
Organise causation and impact before considering claims or an out-of-court response.
What the checklist clarifies and what remains open
Section 1 UWG requires an assessment of the specific commercial conduct and its effect on competition. Neither a targeted approach nor the loss of a customer determines the legal result by itself. The evidential picture as a whole matters.
This checklist helps identify events, participants, statements and possible consequences precisely. It does not replace an assessment of possible injunction or damages claims, contractual obligations or trade-secret issues.
This checklist provides general guidance. It does not determine whether the customer approach was unlawful or whether a claim exists. The assessment depends on the specific conduct, surrounding circumstances, contracts and available evidence.
Related guidance on this site
Subscribe to legal updates
Receive new articles and legal guidance from the firm with BRANDaktuellen Rechtsnews.
Subscribe to the newsletterHave your case reviewed.
Give us a concise outline of the situation. We will clarify which documents are needed and which next step is appropriate.
Let us discuss your case.
Office
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg Österreich
Phone
+43 662 6280000