Competition
Latest

Health claims in food advertising: evidence and prohibited wording

Health claims in food advertising must be authorised, understandable and scientifically supported. The key checks under Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006.

, Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt

Health claims in food advertising directly influence purchasing decisions. Wording such as “supports the immune system”, “good for the heart” or “supports digestion” presents a relationship between a food and health. It is therefore more than creative advertising language.

Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 requires a precise review of the claim, food, substance, serving quantity and audience. A business must distinguish an authorised health claim from a general wellbeing statement and from an impermissible disease claim.

The key question is not merely whether a study describes some positive effect. The exact statement must be supported, understandable to the average consumer and used under the prescribed conditions. That requires a reliable approval file.

Important: A scientific publication alone does not turn an advertising statement into an authorised health claim. The wording, food and conditions of use must be reviewed together.

When advertising wording is a health claim

Article 2(2)(5) of the Regulation covers statements that explain, suggest or imply a relationship between a food category, food or one of its constituents on the one hand and health on the other. The message may be conveyed through words, images, symbols or the overall design of the advertisement.

The word “healthy” is therefore not decisive. An image of a strong heart, a statement about energy and concentration or a reference to immune support may qualify as a health claim. A brand name or fancy name may also fall within the Regulation if it can be understood as such a claim.

The advertising claims review helps organise the wording, audience and evidence. For food advertising, the specific claim review under the Regulation must follow.

The conditions required by Article 5

Article 5 requires the claimed nutritional or physiological effect to be established by generally accepted scientific evidence. The relevant nutrient or other substance must be present in the final product in a suitable amount and, where necessary, in a form available to the body.

The reasonably expected quantity consumed also matters. The food must provide the relevant substance in an amount capable of producing the claimed effect. A recipe that contains only traces of a substance does not automatically support a broad statement.

The average consumer must be able to understand the positive effect as it is presented in the advertising. Claims also concern the food ready for consumption according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Recipe, serving, preparation and wording must therefore remain consistent.

Initial orientation

Which health claim should be reviewed?

The short review path distinguishes a planned claim, active or challenged advertising and a competitor’s health claim. It then helps identify the documents that should be assembled.

Claim, food, audience, list status and evidence determine the initial review.

01 Question 1

Which situation currently applies?

This review path does not make a final legal determination. It organises the claim, food and documents for the next step.

Initial orientation

Which health claim should be reviewed?

01

Before publication, the claim, food and conditions of use must fit together.

Record the exact wording, food, usual serving quantity, audience and supporting material. Then check whether the claim is authorised in the Union list and whether its conditions are met.

02

For active or challenged advertising, the unchanged version must be linked to its product data.

Preserve the advertisement, packaging, landing page, date, channel, recipe, nutrition data and scientific documents. Add the challenge and internal approvals before changing individual versions.

03

A broad wording requires review in the complete advertising context.

Preserve the complete advertisement, landing page, product description and visible qualifications. Record which effect is claimed and what information the audience actually receives.

The authorised list and scientific evidence

Article 10 generally prohibits health claims unless they meet the general and specific requirements of the Regulation, have been authorised and appear in the relevant list. For many functional claims under Article 13, the business therefore needs more than its own study file: it must use the authorised wording and comply with its conditions.

Article 13 covers, among other things, the role of a nutrient or other substance in growth, development and the functions of the body, as well as psychological or behavioural functions. Such claims may be used only within the authorised framework. A free rewording must not broaden the meaning or promise a stronger effect.

Article 6 requires the food business operator to justify the use of the claim. Authorities may request relevant information and data showing compliance with the Regulation. Scientific documents should therefore match the exact recipe, serving and wording rather than merely discussing the substance in general.

Specific information and prohibited wording

Article 10(2) requires additional information where health claims are used in labelling, presentation or advertising. This includes a statement about the importance of a varied and balanced diet and a healthy lifestyle and, where needed, the quantity and pattern of consumption required for the claimed effect.

Article 10(3) permits references to general, non-specific benefits for overall health or health-related wellbeing only when accompanied by a specific authorised claim under Article 13 or 14. A phrase such as “for your wellbeing” does not sit outside the framework where the overall presentation creates a health association.

Article 12 excludes certain claims, including wording suggesting that health could be affected by not consuming the food, statements about the rate or amount of weight loss and impermissible recommendations by individual doctors or health professionals. The exact wording and overall impression remain decisive.

Separate disease-risk claims from cure promises

Article 14 deals separately with claims about the reduction of a disease risk. Such a claim must be authorised and must carry additional information explaining the disease and other risk factors. It cannot be treated as an ordinary functional claim under Article 13.

A statement that attributes prevention, treatment or cure of a disease to a food goes further still. The article on environmental advertising and substantiated claims covers a different claim group. In food health advertising, the boundary to a disease-related message requires particular care.

A general reference to a normal body function is not automatically a cure promise. Conversely, a seemingly cautious phrase may imply a concrete disease effect through images, before-and-after presentation or the target audience. The complete published communication must therefore be reviewed.

Approval file and evidence preservation

A reliable approval file contains the exact wording, all graphic elements, target audience, channel, product name, recipe, nutrition information and usual serving quantity. It should also include the authorised wording, its conditions of use and the scientific justification for the final product.

Recipe changes are particularly important for food supplements and composite foods. A new dosage, different raw material or different serving may change the factual basis. Each version should be archived with its date, responsible approval and affected channels.

After a challenge, preserve the advertisement, packaging, landing page, product data and internal approvals in their original form. The article on authenticity and evidence for customer reviews concerns a different type of proof. For health claims, recipe, list status, conditions and wording must be brought together.

Review a challenge and the advertisement systematically

A challenge should be reviewed against the exact version used. Preserve the letter, service information, affected URLs, product images, packaging, advertising variants and publication period. A later amendment may be sensible, but it does not explain the version that was previously used.

Then ask whether the relationship claimed is a health claim under the Regulation, whether the claim is authorised and whether all conditions were met. The separate article on quality seals and certificates in advertising addresses another issue, but may be relevant to a combined campaign.

For a competitor’s advertising, one screenshot and a personal impression are not enough. The complete context, product presentation, visible qualifications and exact wording matter. Public allegations should be made only after the factual basis has been secured.

FAQ

Common questions about food health claims

Is one scientific study enough for a health claim? +

No. The exact wording must fit the authorised framework. The product, recipe, serving quantity, consumer understanding and specific conditions of use must also be reviewed.

May food be advertised generally as good for health? +

Under Article 10(3), general, non-specific references to overall health or wellbeing are permitted only with a related specific authorised health claim. The overall impression of the advertising matters.

What should be documented before approving a claim? +

Document the wording, product and recipe, usual serving quantity, authorised claim, conditions of use, audience, advertising versions and scientific justification. Version every later change.

Topics

Health claimsFood advertisingRegulation (EC) No 1924/2006AdvertisingUWGEvidence

Have your case reviewed.

Give us a concise outline of the situation. We will clarify which documents are needed and which next step is appropriate.

Contact

Let us discuss your case.

Office

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg Österreich