Competition
Latest

Email advertising and newsletters: Consent and existing customers

When email advertising and newsletters comply with section 174 of the Austrian Telecommunications Act 2021 and how consent, existing customers, ECG list and unsubscribe interact.

, Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt

Email advertising and newsletters are the most important direct line to the customer for many businesses. This is precisely why the law regulates in detail when a message may be sent. Anyone releasing a campaign needs a reliable release path for the actual send, not a general privacy overview.

The central provision is section 174 of the Austrian Telecommunications Act 2021. Paragraph 3 prohibits direct-marketing electronic mail without prior consent of the recipient. Paragraph 4 provides a narrow exception for existing customers whose four requirements must be met together. Paragraph 5 additionally requires an identifiable sender and a genuine channel to refuse further messages.

The lawful basis for using personal data under the GDPR and the permission to send a commercial message are two separate checks. An article can show the structure of the release. The actual message, the mailing list and the existing record of consent decide whether the campaign is lawful in the individual case.

Campaign review: general rule of consent and boundary to data use alone

The general rule in section 174 paragraph 3 of the Telecommunications Act 2021 is short but far-reaching. Electronic mail for direct marketing purposes requires prior consent of the recipient. Electronic mail includes email in particular, but also other text messages distributed over networks. Voice advertising calls and automatic call systems are governed by paragraphs 1 and 2 with comparable strictness.

The term direct marketing is understood broadly. It covers all content intended to promote the sale of goods or services, whether the sender is the beneficiary or a third party. A purely informational appearance does not protect the message where it also carries a commercial statement. Service information about an existing contract is not advertising as long as it is not combined with new offers.

The basis for processing the address under the GDPR is a separate question. Valid consent under data protection law does not automatically replace consent under the Telecommunications Act. A permitted data use does not make sending a commercial message lawful either. Both checks must be documented separately when the campaign is released.

The four conditions of the existing-customer exception in detail

Under section 174 paragraph 4 of the Telecommunications Act 2021, existing customers may be contacted without prior consent where four requirements are met together. First, the contact information must have been obtained in the context of a sale or service by the sender to that customer. A simple registration form without any contractual relationship is not enough.

Second, the message must promote only the sender own similar products or services. Additions and follow-up products in the same use environment are covered. A fundamentally different category falls outside the exception. Third, the recipient must be able to refuse the further use clearly, easily and free of charge at collection and in every subsequent message. The refusal must not create additional cost.

Fourth, no prior objection may exist. In particular, the address must not be entered in the list under section 7 paragraph 2 of the E-Commerce Act, known as the ECG list. If one of the four requirements is missing, sending without a separate consent is not permitted. The four conditions operate as one closed package and cannot substitute for one another.

Important: Where the sender is not clearly identifiable or an easy unsubscribe link is missing, the message is unlawful even with an otherwise valid existing-customer relationship. The unsubscribe link must be visible in every message and must work without additional cost.
Initial orientation

Which situation applies to your email campaign?

The short review path separates newly collected addresses, existing customer relationships and complaints that have already arrived. You can securely send the selected information to the firm after the assessment.

Address source, consent, customer relationship and unsubscribe link determine the release path.

01 Question 1

Which situation applies to the planned email campaign?

This path does not make a legal determination. It only organises the address source and existing approvals for the initial review.

Overview

Which release path an email campaign needs

01

For new addresses, documented consent decides, not the desired send date.

Record the source, collection form, purpose statement, consent wording, timestamp and confirmation evidence. Then check whether the planned message is actually covered by the scope of consent and whether an easy unsubscribe remains visible.

02

The existing-customer exception works only where all four conditions are met together.

Clarify how the address was collected, whether the message concerns your own similar products, whether a visible unsubscribe is present at every use and whether the mailing list has been checked against the ECG list. Missing one requirement means no sending without separate consent.

03

After a complaint or cease and desist letter, evidence and processes must be brought into one ordered file.

Preserve the complete letter, service date, affected list, exact message, sign-up records and unsubscribe handling. Pause parallel sendings to the same address before the legal review is finished.

ECG list under section 7 paragraph 2 ECG: extract, process and records

The ECG list is a central register in which persons and businesses can request that they receive no commercial communication by electronic mail. The register is maintained by the Austrian regulator RTR and is also known as the Robinson list. An entry has effect against every sender.

Before each mailing to an Austrian recipient, the mailing list must be compared with a current extract of the ECG list. The comparison should be traceable. A defined procedure, a technically recorded moment of comparison and preservation of the result are useful in practice. Only then can it later be shown that no entry existed at the time the message was sent.

A single comparison is not enough for ongoing newsletters. The address base has to be checked again before every new send. In automated campaign flows the check and its outcome belong in the release protocol. Where an address is blocked, it must be removed from every affected list and flagged so that it will not be used again.

Sender identification, imprint, unsubscribe link and section 6 ECG

Under section 174 paragraph 5 of the Telecommunications Act 2021, several situations are expressly prohibited. The identity of the sender must not be concealed or disguised. A breach of section 6 paragraph 1 of the E-Commerce Act must be avoided, especially the failure to identify a commercial communication, an unclear sender indication or unrecognisable offers and promotional actions with their conditions.

Links must not lead to websites that breach the E-Commerce Act or other advertising rules. In addition, an authentic address must exist where the recipient can refuse further messages. A reply to an unmonitored inbox or a link without any real effect is not enough.

The unsubscribe link should be clearly visible in every message, should work without login or extra steps and should take effect immediately. Unsubscribes must be processed reliably, across systems and quickly on every mailing list. Failures at this point rarely concern one newsletter alone. They usually affect the entire sending environment.

Segmentation, similar products and editorial versus commercial content

The existing-customer exception applies only to your own similar products or services. What counts as similar follows from the concrete use environment and the customer expectation at the original contract. A short segment logic in the CRM helps to build lawful selections and records the basis of the choice.

Newsletters with mixed content are especially sensitive. Once an editorial message contains an offer, discount or purchase incentive, it is treated as commercial communication. The separation between information and advertising should be clearly recognisable. Purely contractual information such as contract confirmations or security notices remains permissible where no additional advertising is added.

The advertising claims self-check organises the type of claim, the audience, evidence and visible qualifications. For an email campaign, record additionally which segment the recipients come from, which customer relationship exists and how similarity to the original purchase is justified.

Complaints, Telecommunications Office, UWG claims and evidence

In practice, complaints about unwanted email advertising often reach the Austrian Telecommunications Office. In parallel, competitors or associations may act under the UWG because unlawful commercial communication may also constitute an unfair commercial practice. Both routes can run at the same time and may call for separate responses.

The article on a UWG cease and desist letter from a competitor or association explains the separate review of the claim, undertaking and evidence. The article on the limitation of injunction claims under section 20 UWG sets out the time frame for possible claims.

The sending business should be able to demonstrate valid consent or every condition of the existing-customer exception in full. Sign-up moment, confirmation message, stored consent wording, change logs and unsubscribe records must therefore be preserved so that they can later be presented. Screenshots taken after the fact are rarely sufficient.

FAQ

Common questions about email advertising and newsletters

Is a single purchase enough for the existing-customer exception in the long run? +

Not automatically. In addition to the collection in the context of the sale, the exception requires content similarity to the original purchase and a working unsubscribe channel at every send. No objection may exist, in particular no entry in the ECG list. A very long period without contact can weaken the assumption of continued customer interest.

Does a GDPR consent already cover the newsletter send? +

Not in every case. The basis under the GDPR covers the processing of the address. Sending a commercial message additionally requires consent under section 174 of the Telecommunications Act 2021 or the complete set of existing-customer conditions. Both grounds should be checked and recorded separately.

What should happen if a recipient objects? +

The objection must be implemented across all systems without delay. The address must be removed from every affected list and blocked against further advertising. The event should also be recorded with time and source so that further sendings to the same address remain excluded.

Topics

Email advertisingNewsletterConsentSection 174 TKGECG listUWGExisting customers

Have your case reviewed.

Give us a concise outline of the situation. We will clarify which documents are needed and which next step is appropriate.

Contact

Let us discuss your case.

Office

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg Österreich